JAMA:ADHD药物不会导致中青年患者心血管风险增高
2011-12-16 爱唯医学网 爱唯医学网
12月12日,国际著名杂志《美国医学会杂志》The Journal of the American Medical Association刊登了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究成果“ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in Young and Middle-aged Adults。”,这项研究表明用于治疗注意力缺陷/多动
12月12日,国际著名杂志《美国医学会杂志》The Journal of the American Medical Association刊登了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究成果“ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in Young and Middle-aged Adults。”,这项研究表明用于治疗注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的药物并不会导致中青年患者的严重心血管事件风险增高。
主要研究者、北加州凯撒医疗集团的Laurel A. Habel博士指出,哌醋甲酯、苯异丙胺、匹莫林等刺激物和选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂托莫西汀,已被证实可增加心率,使收缩压和舒张压分别增加 2~5 mmHg和1~3 mmHg。“虽然这一程度的心血管效应理论上不会转化为心肌梗死、心源性猝死和卒中等事件风险的大幅增加,但一直缺乏大规模试验数据的支持。”而且来自药物流行病学研究的心血管安全性数据十分有限和不一致。
Habel博士及其同事在一个纳入443,198名25~64岁成年人的队列中评估了ADHD药物与心血管风险的关联。共有150,359名受试者曾使用ADHD药物,包括哌醋甲酯(45%)、苯异丙胺(44%)、托莫西汀(8%)和匹莫林(3%)。在806,182人-年的随访中共发生1,357 例心肌梗死、296例心源性猝死和575例卒中。
在这些事件的总发生率方面,目前使用ADHD药物者与非使用者之间无显著性差异,多变量校正比率(RR)为0.83;目前使用ADHD药物者与既往使用ADHD药物者之间也无显著性差异(RR,1.03)。对各种药物分别进行分析,或单独分析缺血性和出血性卒中的风险,仍得出一致结果(JAMA 2011 Dec. 12 [doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1830])。
为了校正有暴露者与无暴露者在心血管风险方面的潜在差异,研究者在基线时让每名受试者填写了心血管风险评估简表。在校正风险评分后,结果并无改变:不论基线时心血管风险如何,ADHD药物使用者与非使用者的心血管事件风险相似。研究者还发现,新近使用ADHD药物者与长期使用者的心血管风险亦无显著差异。各亚组分析的结果也与总体结果一致。由于缺乏某些重要危险因素和用药剂量的信息,这项大规模研究仍不能完全排除ADHD药物导致风险轻度升高的可能性。
美国国立人类基因组研究所的Philip Shaw博士在随刊述评中指出,这项设计严谨的大规模研究表明,与使用ADHD药物相关的心血管风险增加的绝对量非常小,且用药时间与心血管风险无关,从而使得临床医生可以更有把握地接受ADHD患者的咨询并给予其治疗。
这项研究部分由美国医疗保健研究和质量局(AHRQ)、美国食品药品管理局(FDA)和美国国立衰老研究所(NIA)资助。Habel博士报告与默克、武田和赛诺菲-安万特等公司有联系,其合著者报告与Optuminsight、默克、葛兰素史克、诺华和雅培等公司有联系。Shaw博士承认接受 了哌醋甲酯生产商Jannsen-Cilag提供的差旅费。(生物谷Bioon.com)
ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in Young and Middle-aged Adults
Laurel A. Habel, PhD; William O. Cooper, MD, MPH; Colin M. Sox, MD, MS; K. Arnold Chan, MD, ScD; Bruce H. Fireman, MA; Patrick G. Arbogast, PhD; T. Craig Cheetham, PharmD, MS; Virginia P. Quinn, PhD, MPH; Sascha Dublin, MD, PhD; Denise M. Boudreau, PhD, RPh; Susan E. Andrade, ScD; Pamala A. Pawloski, PharmD; Marsha A. Raebel, PharmD; David H. Smith, RPh, PhD; Ninah Achacoso, MS; Connie Uratsu, RN; Alan S. Go, MD; Steve Sidney, MD, MPH; Mai N. Nguyen-Huynh, MD, MAS; Wayne A. Ray, PhD; Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH
Context More than 1.5 million US adults use stimulants and other medications labeled for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These agents can increase heart rate and blood pressure, raising concerns about their cardiovascular safety.
Objective To examine whether current use of medications prescribed primarily to treat ADHD is associated with increased risk of serious cardiovascular events in young and middle-aged adults.
Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective, population-based cohort study using electronic health care records from 4 study sites (OptumInsight Epidemiology, Tennessee Medicaid, Kaiser Permanente California, and the HMO Research Network), starting in 1986 at 1 site and ending in 2005 at all sites, with additional covariate assessment using 2007 survey data. Participants were adults aged 25 through 64 years with dispensed prescriptions for methylphenidate, amphetamine, or atomoxetine at baseline. Each medication user (n = 150 359) was matched to 2 nonusers on study site, birth year, sex, and calendar year (443 198 total users and nonusers).
Main Outcome Measures Serious cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death (SCD), or stroke, with comparison between current or new users and remote users to account for potential healthy-user bias.
Results During 806 182 person-years of follow-up (median, 1.3 years per person), 1357 cases of MI, 296 cases of SCD, and 575 cases of stroke occurred. There were 107 322 person-years of current use (median, 0.33 years), with a crude incidence per 1000 person-years of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.14-1.57) for MI, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.20-0.42) for SCD, and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.43-0.72) for stroke. The multivariable-adjusted rate ratio (RR) of serious cardiovascular events for current use vs nonuse of ADHD medications was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.96). Among new users of ADHD medications, the adjusted RR was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.94). The adjusted RR for current use vs remote use was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.24); for new use vs remote use, the adjusted RR was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.82-1.28); the upper limit of 1.28 corresponds to an additional 0.19 events per 1000 person-years at ages 25-44 years and 0.77 events per 1000 person-years at ages 45-64 years. Conclusions Among young and middle-aged adults, current or new use of ADHD medications, compared with nonuse or remote use, was not associated with an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events. Apparent protective associations likely represent healthy-user bias.
本网站所有内容来源注明为“梅斯医学”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源为“梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,或“梅斯号”自媒体发布的文章,仅系出于传递更多信息之目的,本站仅负责审核内容合规,其内容不代表本站立场,本站不负责内容的准确性和版权。如果存在侵权、或不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
#ADHD药物#
51
#青年患者#
50
#血管风险#
42
#ADHD#
36
#增高#
0
#增高#
30
#中青年#
39