Baidu
map
ACS CATAL 润色咨询

ACS Catalysis

出版年份:2011 年文章数:1323 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Biweekly 自引率:7.0% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2023-09-18 ms2000002053770036 来自辽宁省

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
    偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质
    经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted
    2022.6.20 associated editor assigned
    2022.6.22 in peer review
    2022.7.14 major revision
    2022.8.10 submitted
    2022.8.25 minor revision
    2022.8.26 submitted
    2022.8.31 accepted
    编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利.

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2016-11-22 ms7260643641707155

    几年9月13号投稿
    10月28号 一个审稿人小修
    11月13号返回
    到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊

    2

    展开2条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-04-28 ms6464727228940210

    最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了

    1

    展开1条回复
  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-03-03 ms1582630781068122

    审稿速度:3.0
    经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。
    修了一个月后返回。
    二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。
    修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.
    整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。

    1

    展开1条回复
  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-28 ms6000000264964247

    是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?

    1

    展开1条回复
  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 衣谷

    什么叫实验室常规使用方法?

    1

    展开1条回复
  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-03-19 ms7657656453231030

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢?

    2

    展开2条回复
  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-13 ms6336778790072332

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-16 ms9686134410729756

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2158288, encodeId=6fe5215828807, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>偏重的研究方向:催化转化;木质纤维生物质<br>经验分享:2022.6.20 sunmitted<br>2022.6.20 associated editor assigned<br>2022.6.22 in peer review<br>2022.7.14 major revision<br>2022.8.10 submitted<br>2022.8.25 minor revision<br>2022.8.26 submitted<br>2022.8.31 accepted<br>编辑效率非常高,审稿人也很严谨负责,祝acs catalysis 越办越好,也祝大家投稿顺利., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6cb68326335, createdName=ms2000002053770036, createdTime=Mon Sep 18 14:32:40 CST 2023, time=2023-09-18, status=1, ipAttribution=辽宁省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=834682, encodeId=b145834682e9, content=几年9月13号投稿<br> 10月28号 一个审稿人小修<br> 11月13号返回<br> 到今天没有消息 快过10天了 是不是 再送另一个审稿人了呀 等的好着急啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Tue Nov 22 09:26:09 CST 2016, time=2016-11-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842651, encodeId=c51b842651c7, content=最近没人点评吗?已投稿40天了,依然音信全无,是不是要跪了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=25d45414007, createdName=ms6464727228940210, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 01:06:10 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858017, encodeId=85d785801e74, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:一审47天,一共四个审稿人,都给了大修。编辑和审稿人很专业也很严格,因为文章中涉及少部分计算问题,所以编辑找了三个专门搞有机的审稿人和一个专门搞计算的审稿人,提了很多修改意见。<br> 修了一个月后返回。<br> 二审,又送了两个审稿人,一个直接接收,一个小修,编辑给小修。<br> 修了3天后返回,第二天接收,当天出proof,第三天出asap.<br> 整体感觉这个期刊还是非常严格的,希望能够越办越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3ac05413990, createdName=ms1582630781068122, createdTime=Tue Mar 03 21:07:18 CST 2020, time=2020-03-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104129, encodeId=f19a110412904, content=是否一定要按照结果的顺序撰写方法的顺序?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=111, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1104130, encodeId=97241104130fc, content=什么叫实验室常规使用方法?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:52 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858548, encodeId=c839858548f3, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:我的第一次2个大修,一个小修,主编chen给了大修,大修返回都一个多月了,还没有任何结果,为何会这么慢? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=181, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 11:10:29 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860490, encodeId=c5898604902d, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:以前发过这个期刊,当时觉得这个期刊审稿特别严,特别是编辑也很严,当时遇到的是olsbye副主编,当时不仅对工作创新性提比较高的要求而且数据量也要全面。可是最近acs catal上真的有很多文章我看不懂为啥能发了,数量很小而且工作创新性也不太高,解释也不到位,感觉这个期刊发的部分文章越来越讲噱头和鼓吹某一个概念,但其实工作并不扎实。j catal相比之下工作至少非常扎实,不会看到明显概念的错误。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=201, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Wed May 13 09:16:02 CST 2020, time=2020-05-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859494, encodeId=81ed8594948c, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:acs上很多观点很新颖也值得关注。前两年感觉这个期刊的图片都很漂亮,可是这两年,图片质量不太上档次了,而且有些工作虽然观点新,可是工作系统性比较一般。作为专业型期刊,期刊的发文量感觉有些太大了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f6f95414014, createdName=ms9686134410729756, createdTime=Thu Apr 16 09:39:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858114, encodeId=b344858114d9, content=acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。<br> publication history<br> received: 19 december 2019<br> published online: 3 march 2020 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Fri Mar 06 14:50:19 CST 2020, time=2020-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-03-06 ms658988217505615

    acs catalysis 效率很高,一审20天返回意见,一大修两小修。返修回去,7天后通知接受,个人第一次中这个期刊,祝acs catalysis越来越好。
    publication history
    received: 19 december 2019
    published online: 3 march 2020

    0

共53条页码: 1/6页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map