JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 桑晒麦拉

长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？

88 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-27 小动量

IF是什么？

0 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2012-04-05 匿名用户

是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是：
之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。
气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。

460 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2012-04-05 匿名用户

是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是：
之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。
气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。

484 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2010-07-06 匿名用户

太难了，投5次拒5次

394 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考？审稿人对MS印象好？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=88, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志，只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，同时附上我们接受文章的pdf，以及目前投稿文章，一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=460, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志，只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见，就直接拒稿，具体情况是： 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章，以合作者为主，然后我们用这篇文章的序列，以及其他人文章的序列，重新做了进化分析，发现一些新结果，接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容，只因为用了接受文章的序列，竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 气愤之下，写了rebuttal，过了大概6天，editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=484, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了，投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=574, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2010-07-06 昏

投过一回，蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准，估计中国的文章不是很感冒

574 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务