不收MR文章
New analytical methodologies continue to be introduced in our field. MR is a potentially powerful method that is proposed to strengthen causal inferences derived from observational epidemiological data and evidence provided by genetic variants. However, as with some other analytic methodologies, it is subject to potential biases that can limit its validity when seeking a causative interpretation of results. Until this methodology has been shown to be sufficiently robust and more readily assessed, RBMO will not be considering studies derived from this approach.
不收MR文章 New analytical methodologies continue to be introduced in our field. MR is a potentially powerful method that is proposed to strengthen causal inferences derived from observational epidemiological data and evidence provided by genetic variants. However, as with some other analytic methodologies, it is subject to potential biases that can limit its validity when seeking a causative interpretation of results. Until this methodology has been shown to be sufficiently robust and more readily assessed, RBMO will not be considering studies derived from this approach.
7
效率太差了;
2020-2-15 投稿;2-25 外审;3-4 外审更新;3-13 再次更新,with editor; 马上一个月了,编辑就是做不出决定。。。 被隔离了么= =
257
请问前辈,版面费贵不贵?
242
审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
偏重的研究方向:胚胎
经验分享:送审两周就回意见了,40个超级大问题,给了一个月修稿时间。非常艰难地极限完成了,几乎是把原始数据全部重新分析一遍。再给回去,两个审稿人都非常满意,给了Very well done的评语,两周接收。从投稿到接收只花了三个月,算是很快的。感觉收获非常大,审稿人问问题很专业,第一次做临床研究,初稿本身有些基础知识的错误,审稿人都非常耐心地一一指出,编辑给了回复和修改的机会,感恩。
116
11月30号投的,第二天with editor,第四天 submitted to the journal,期待中
476
摘要中一定要加入研究目标么?
167
摘要撰写有什么套路?有没有模板?
167
instructions for authoers一直打不开,不知道怎么回事
1
审稿速度:2.0
经验分享:2-15 投稿 4-3 被拒
两个审稿 一个认可 一个拒稿 醉了
257
审稿速度:1.0
经验分享:投稿外泌体测序文章,5天拒稿 效率还可以
242