Baidu
map
NAT NANOTECHNOL 润色咨询

Nature Nanotechnology

出版年份：2006 年文章数：2021 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Monthly 自引率：1.3% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-01-31 sunliang

    牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:
    第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒.
    两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!

    zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒.
    两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!

    1

    展开1条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-28 MS54455111222

    回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 小动量

    如何回复期刊编辑的意见？

    1

    展开1条回复
  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-13 ms5413142457057855

    每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了

    1

    展开1条回复
  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-07-16 gu_8183

    谁能预测明年会有多少分?

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-04-08 ms6967342940128728

    审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据，

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2016-08-17 ms4160399524644389

    审稿速度:3.0
    经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2015-07-12 zhengyuanyi

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。
    两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-07-24 ms4391593229390302

    极慢也极难 31.多

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?<span class="quote">zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:<br>第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!</span>, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. <br> 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=476, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=179, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=176, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=251, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=474, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=292, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=264, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 <br> 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=611, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=284, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=756, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-07-18 longkelonni8595

    一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~

    0

共16条页码: 1/2页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map