NEJM:支气管炎患儿雾化治疗应按需给药
2013-06-15 青楚 医学论坛网
急性细支气管炎常见于婴幼儿,目前并无明确的治疗策略。近期挪威学者的一项研究显示,雾化外消旋肾上腺素的效果并不优于雾化生理盐水。两种药物在改善住院时间、吸氧、鼻饲管的植入、辅助通气等方面标新类似。而按照患儿实际需要给药的治疗策略明显优于每两次给药一次。相关论文2013年6月13日在线发表于NEJM杂志。 该大型多中心随机对照研究共纳入404名平均年龄4.2个月的急性细支
急性细支气管炎常见于婴幼儿,目前并无明确的治疗策略。近期挪威学者的一项研究显示,雾化外消旋肾上腺素的效果并不优于雾化生理盐水。两种药物在改善住院时间、吸氧、鼻饲管的植入、辅助通气等方面标新类似。而按照患儿实际需要给药的治疗策略明显优于每两次给药一次。相关论文2013年6月13日在线发表于NEJM杂志。
该大型多中心随机对照研究共纳入404名平均年龄4.2个月的急性细支气管炎患儿。作者对比了雾化外消旋肾上腺素VS雾化生理盐水,以及不同治疗频率(每两小时一次VS按患儿需要给药)的效果。
结果显示,两种药物在改善住院时间、吸氧、鼻饲管的植入、辅助通气等方面标新类似(所有的比较均显示P>0.1) 。而按照患儿实际需要给药与常规2小时一次给药相比,住院时间更短(分别为47.6小时和61.3小时,P=0.01)、接受辅助通气也更少(分别为4.0%和10.8%,P=0.01)。
Background
Acute bronchiolitis in infants frequently results in hospitalization, but there is no established consensus on inhalation therapy — either the type of medication or the frequency of administration — that may be of value. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of inhaled racemic adrenaline as compared with inhaled saline and the strategy for frequency of inhalation (on demand vs. fixed schedule) in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis.
Methods
In this eight-center, randomized, double-blind trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we compared inhaled racemic adrenaline with inhaled saline and on-demand inhalation with fixed-schedule inhalation (up to every 2 hours) in infants (<12 months of age) with moderate-to-severe acute bronchiolitis. An overall clinical score of 4 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe illness) was required for study inclusion. Any use of oxygen therapy, nasogastric-tube feeding, or ventilatory support was recorded. The primary outcome was the length of the hospital stay, with analyses conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Results
The mean age of the 404 infants included in the study was 4.2 months, and 59.4% were boys. Length of stay, use of oxygen supplementation, nasogastric-tube feeding, ventilatory support, and relative improvement in the clinical score from baseline (preinhalation) were similar in the infants treated with inhaled racemic adrenaline and those treated with inhaled saline (P>0.1 for all comparisons). On-demand inhalation, as compared with fixed-schedule inhalation, was associated with a significantly shorter estimated mean length of stay — 47.6 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.6 to 64.6) versus 61.3 hours (95% CI, 45.4 to 77.2; P=0.01) — as well as less use of oxygen supplementation (in 38.3% of infants vs. 48.7%, P=0.04), less use of ventilatory support (in 4.0% vs. 10.8%, P=0.01), and fewer inhalation treatments (12.0 vs. 17.0, P<0.001).
Conclusions
In the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in infants, inhaled racemic adrenaline is not more effective than inhaled saline. However, the strategy of inhalation on demand appears to be superior to that of inhalation on a fixed schedule. (Funded by Medicines for Children; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00817466; EudraCT number, 2009-012667-34.)
本网站所有内容来源注明为“梅斯医学”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源为“梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,或“梅斯号”自媒体发布的文章,仅系出于传递更多信息之目的,本站仅负责审核内容合规,其内容不代表本站立场,本站不负责内容的准确性和版权。如果存在侵权、或不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
#支气管#
66
#雾化治疗#
71
#雾化#
72