Nature:中国将改革科研资助体系,“973”和“863”可能被中止
2014-10-25 孙学军 科学网
今天《自然》发布重磅消息,中国将大力改革科研资助体系,传统的资助模式以及计划可能全部进行改变。到2017年,现行的973和863等重大科技资助项目将被停止,并整合国家自然科学基金,重新设计5种不同类型的科研资助体系,科研部统一管理。这将是国家对竞争性科研计划最大的一次改革。 1. the National Natural Science Foundation (
今天《自然》发布重磅消息,中国将大力改革科研资助体系,传统的资助模式以及计划可能全部进行改变。
1. the National Natural Science Foundation (which currently distributes many of the small-scale competitive grants);国家自然科学基金(主要小额普惠型资助)
2. national science and technology major projects;相当于原来的973(大型国家科技项目)
3. key national research and development programmes;相当于以前的863 (重大关键技术的突破性研究)
4. a special fund to guide technological innovation;技术创新基金,如目前的新药创制等基金形式
5. and special projects for developing human resources and infrastructure.这可能整合目前的社科类基金。
These five will be managed under a new science and technology agency that will unify planning and assessment of scientific projects.
On 20 October, the Chinese government announced the passage of a reform plan that will fundamentally reshape research in the country.
By 2017, the main competitive government funding initiatives will be eliminated. This includes the ’863′ and ’973′ programmes, two channels for large grants that have been at the heart of modern China’s development of science and technology infrastructure since being established in 1986 and 1997, respectively.
The government announcement noted that wastefulness and fragmented management has led to overlaps and inefficient use of funds for science and technology, and the need for a unified platform for distributing grants. As new funding programmes have been added over the years, competitive funding has become divided among some 100 competitive schemes overseen by about 30 different governmental departments.
Although efforts to reorganize science in China are already underway, the latest reform will be comprehensive. Science and technology spending by the central government was 77.4 billion yuan renminbi (US$12.6 billion) in 2006 but jumped to 236 billion yuan renminbi in 2013, 11.6% of the central government’s direct public expenditure. Some 60% of this is competitive funding, and subject to change under under the new reforms. To maintain stability, the overhaul will not affect the remaining 40%, which covers operation costs for research institutes and key state laboratories.
本网站所有内容来源注明为“梅斯医学”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源为“梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,或“梅斯号”自媒体发布的文章,仅系出于传递更多信息之目的,本站仅负责审核内容合规,其内容不代表本站立场,本站不负责内容的准确性和版权。如果存在侵权、或不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
#Nat#
59
#973#
75
应该科学和行政全部分开
199
在中国,热爱科学、有科研能力但没有权利的知识分子多得很。因此,在中国要特别鼓励“自费科研”,成功后重奖!
116
你知道有多少没有权而爱科学的科学家,终生在用自己的生活费搞科研吗?
101
那是因为你没本事,动不动就扯到腐败?小学生你接触过科研么,还不想搞科研,您是在逗
218
不想读研不想搞科研的原因就是觉得学术界恶心,那么多科研经费有两层用在科研上了吗?学术界的的腐败堪比官场,甚至更严重
114
不想读研不想搞科研的原因就是觉得学术界恶心,那么多科研经费有两层用在科研上了吗?学术界的的腐败堪比官场,甚至更严重
107