Baidu
map
J HYDROL 润色咨询

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY

出版年份:1963 年文章数:13559 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Biweekly 自引率:13.9% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 桑晒麦拉

    文章题目一般要求几个字?

    2

    展开2条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 msSSSSSD

    什么是MS?

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-31 ms8762254248151793

    专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~
    2020.3.24 submit
    2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。
    2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。
    2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切!

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-31 ms4294801609865205

    审稿速度:3.0
    经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~
    2020.3.24 submit
    2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。
    2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。
    2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切!

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-16 ms2998163265174406

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。
    【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26
    不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-11 ms5075507494691300

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:
    二月中旬: submission
    2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review
    直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)
    终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!
    今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!
    不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?
    是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...
    忐忑并困惑。。。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-26 ms9526231670310936

    received 8 december 2019;
    received in revised form 16 april 2020;
    accepted 24 april 2020
    纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中!

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-24 ms5534528927444041

    闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-17 ms804033028710664

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093352, encodeId=6f7b109335290, content=文章题目一般要求几个字?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1093351, encodeId=738e109335192, content=什么是MS?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:49 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861222, encodeId=f36286122287, content=专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate revision,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=186, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:21:05 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861221, encodeId=6c5386122187, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:专硕第一篇sci,本来对自己特别没自信,老师说让我投jh,自己想着肯定被拒稿,打算被拒稿后再投一个次一点的期刊,没想到投稿过程比较顺利,感恩~~<br> 2020.3.24 submit<br> 2020.4.20 收到审稿结果 moderate review,两个审稿人意见都很积极,其中一个审稿人居然撞到该领域的专家,审稿相当仔细,连公式标注的问题都指出来了,给了很多意见,但是都比较好改。两个审稿人都强调要改引言,突出文章的亮点。<br> 2020.5.15 修改了快一个月,改动还算比较大的,再次投回去。<br> 2020.5.30 直接 accepted,整个过程比预想中顺利很多,只能说感恩一切! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=172, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Sun May 31 00:17:54 CST 2020, time=2020-05-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860609, encodeId=ce91860609b0, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:不知道是受到疫情影响还是自己水平不行,2个月几乎都是在邀请审稿人,真正under review的时间不超过10天,最震惊的是,最近的一次在显示under review仅仅两天之后,就出现了with editor.大概率是悲剧了,只希望给一些中肯的建议,也不算白白浪费两个月。 <br> 【oceanography】2020-05-16 11:02:26<br> 不要那么悲观,只要送审了就有希望,有可能是审稿人效率很高,快速返回审稿意见。jh好期刊,加油!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=192, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d5d55414009, createdName=ms2998163265174406, createdTime=Sat May 16 08:31:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860409, encodeId=fb8f860409b6, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:学术小白的第一篇paper。。。翻来覆去改了几个月才满意。好巧不巧赶上新冠,送审了。时间线大概如下:<br> 二月中旬: submission<br> 2天后: reviewer invited,之后就是under review<br> 直到三月底, 状态再次变成reviewer invited (不知是不是因为欧洲疫情)<br> 终于熬到了4.27,收到邮件说required reviewer complete!<br> 今天再一看状态,又回到reviewer invited....!<br> 不知道是出了什么状况,为何要再请一次审稿人呢?<br> 是意味着编辑不满意之前的review吗...<br> 忐忑并困惑。。。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=206, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Mon May 11 04:54:46 CST 2020, time=2020-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859876, encodeId=30788598e6f8, content=received 8 december 2019; <br> received in revised form 16 april 2020; <br> accepted 24 april 2020<br> 纵然修改后2专家让录用发表,但遇到了领域内的大牛给的意见(主编说的)!很专业,很重,差点退稿!最后2次返修(历时1个月一个句子一个句子的修改)才给录用。第二篇journal of hydrology. 第三篇筹备中,希望能中! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=69885414022, createdName=ms9526231670310936, createdTime=Sun Apr 26 11:14:45 CST 2020, time=2020-04-26, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859783, encodeId=27b2859e836c, content=闲着无聊,检索了一下web of science,发现一个有趣的现象:2018-2019年间,jh上发表论文所引用的文献中,42.5%是国内的文献,美国的文献只有21.3%;wrr上发表论文所引用的文献中,44.4%是美国的文献,国内的文献只有25.8%;新期刊water上发表论文所引用的文献中,29.6%是国内的文献,16.4%是美国的文献,而water上发表的论文基本不引wrr或wr上的论文(排在10名之外),而对jh引用的相对较多(排在第4名)。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=167, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b5995414063, createdName=ms5534528927444041, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 07:53:40 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859532, encodeId=ead9859532e5, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:在国人的努力下,jh终于完成了对wrr的反超。2020年新的预测if是4.62 继续超越。但我个人觉得还是wrr好一些。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=210, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=883e5414054, createdName=ms804033028710664, createdTime=Fri Apr 17 10:16:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858546, encodeId=792285854651, content=这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。<br> 另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。<br> 然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?<br> 我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么??? , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d9055413985, createdName=ms248080445684567, createdTime=Thu Mar 19 10:11:10 CST 2020, time=2020-03-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-03-19 ms248080445684567

    这期刊的编辑真搞笑。。。找了两个审稿人,其中一个肯定文章很有创新性。
    另外一个完全没看懂我们的文章,只写了两行评论,就说我们把total porosity和effective porosity搞混了,说应该用effective而我们用的是total所以模型问题很大。可我们明显用的effective porosity啊!只不过我们没有在porosity前面加effective这个词而已啊。。。审稿人这都看不出来么。。。
    然后编辑就直接拒稿???因为没有大牛连一次justify的机会都没有?
    我之前的几篇文章能中和joh水平相当的期刊,自以为这篇比原来的质量明显更高,结果被这么搞笑的拒了,joh找审稿人水平就这么低么???

    0

共66条页码: 1/7页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map