Baidu
map
FOOD HYDROCOLLOID 润色咨询

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS

出版年份:1986 年文章数:5960 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Bimonthly 自引率:16.4% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2023-08-14 ms8000001543324544 来自宁夏

    偏重的研究方向:食品
    经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了

    5

    展开5条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-25 ms1688128040813029

    2019.6.16 投稿
    2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)
    2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)
    2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)
    2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)
    2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)
    2020.4.16 接受
    r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-09-13 zhaer

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊
    13/Apr/2019: Initial submission
    15/Apr/2019: With Editor
    24/Apr/2019: Under Review
    17/Jun/2019: Major Revision
    21/Jul/2019: Re-submission
    28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production
    29/Aug/2019: Article published online

    4

    展开4条回复
  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 msSSSSSD

    模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?

    1

    展开1条回复
  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 桑晒麦拉

    实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?

    1

    展开1条回复
  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-08-10 ms6459520362745523

    审稿速度:3.0
    经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal
    nov 30, 2018 with editor
    nov 30, 2018 under review
    mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)
    mar 15, 2019 submit the revision
    mar 16, 2019 with editor
    mar 16, 2019 under review
    april 21, 2018 accepte
    编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-08-05 ms6336778790072332

    2019.05投稿,
    ready for decision 变两次
    06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;
    07中旬修返,
    7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修
    2019.07底修返,08月初接受。
    供参考。祝好运!

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-08 ms7999216884373889

    我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-04 ms6597719114830456

    整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人..............

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2152698, encodeId=a3c0215269810, content=偏重的研究方向:食品<br>经验分享:8月8日投稿,8月9日With Editor, 8月12日Decision in Process,是不是没戏了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=5, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3cbf8459572, createdName=ms8000001543324544, createdTime=Mon Aug 14 15:18:57 CST 2023, time=2023-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=宁夏), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859852, encodeId=22038598529d, content=2019.6.16 投稿<br> 2019.8.20 一审返回意见(大修)<br> 2019.12.2 二审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.2.7 三审返回(修订)<br> 2020.3.12 四审返回意见(修订)<br> 2020.4.2 五审返回意见(小修)<br> 2020.4.16 接受<br> r0-r5刚好10个月,两个审稿人应该都是老外,特别地严谨,任何一个小问题都会指出来。由衷地敬佩他们做学术的严谨态度。感谢西班牙的susana fiszman教授,处理稿件效率极高。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=114, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=df635413989, createdName=ms1688128040813029, createdTime=Sat Apr 25 18:40:10 CST 2020, time=2020-04-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=576265, encodeId=ae7c5e626543, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:审稿人专业认真,不错的期刊 <br> 13/Apr/2019: Initial submission <br> 15/Apr/2019: With Editor <br> 24/Apr/2019: Under Review <br> 17/Jun/2019: Major Revision <br> 21/Jul/2019: Re-submission <br> 28/Aug/2019: Accepted/Received for production <br> 29/Aug/2019: Article published online, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=183, replyNumber=4, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=98bd1976614, createdName=zhaer, createdTime=Fri Sep 13 11:26:00 CST 2019, time=2019-09-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090645, encodeId=4791109064577, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090646, encodeId=732c109064626, content=实验数据被抢先发表了怎么办?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853101, encodeId=72f18531014b, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享:nov 28, 2018 submitted to journal<br> nov 30, 2018 with editor<br> nov 30, 2018 under review<br> mar 13, 2019 minor revision(两个审稿人,两个小修)<br> mar 15, 2019 submit the revision<br> mar 16, 2019 with editor<br> mar 16, 2019 under review<br> april 21, 2018 accepte<br> 编辑为susana fiszman教授,效率很高,两次都是当天处理稿件当天送审,非常感谢susana fiszman教授。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Sat Aug 10 19:08:55 CST 2019, time=2019-08-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853000, encodeId=3f7685300056, content=2019.05投稿,<br> ready for decision 变两次<br> 06中旬收到一审,4个审稿意见reviewer1-4,大修;<br> 07中旬修返,<br> 7月下旬收到二审,第5个审稿人意见reviewer 5,小修<br> 2019.07底修返,08月初接受。<br> 供参考。祝好运! , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6f225414024, createdName=ms6336778790072332, createdTime=Mon Aug 05 22:09:48 CST 2019, time=2019-08-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852451, encodeId=6a6085245147, content=我5月中旬投的稿,under review 45天,编辑给了拒稿。其中有个审稿人没有仔细看我的文章,提的一些意见不合理,断章取义地给了一些意见。我不能信服,张罗着写申诉信,总共写了12页的意见回复,希望能够申诉成功。有两个审稿人,第一个基本上没什么意见,第二个提了600词的意见,但是从意见内容上看,他估计没看懂我的文章,甚至我怀疑都没有仔细看。在结果与分析部分给我提意见,让我把取样步骤加一下。“哥,我这是结果与分析部分,您得看材料与方法部分,那里面我说的很详细了”。其他的建设性意见我在初投稿也有深入讨论,他让我增加解释。从该审稿人的马虎程度来看,完全有理由相信他是没有认真审我的文章,我不是第一次投稿,也不是第一次被拒搞,但是这样的审稿意见还是第一次见。做食品胶体的本身可选的好期刊不多,希望食品水胶体不要辜负大家的信赖。同时也给各位同仁分享个经验,因为我们实验室不算大实验室,也没有和编辑部或者食品胶体领域的知名专家有过学术上的交往,我在推荐审稿人的时候几乎推荐的都是我不认识的审稿人,有可能这次我的稿件送给了一个不是本领域的专家审的稿。从他给的意见来看,我猜测他应该不是食品领域的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a6a75413984, createdName=ms7999216884373889, createdTime=Mon Jul 08 09:42:37 CST 2019, time=2019-07-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852369, encodeId=abe18523698a, content=整个审稿周期跨越3个年头,2016~2019,历经r9终于接收,编辑是个日本人.............. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=131, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Thu Jul 04 06:28:13 CST 2019, time=2019-07-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=851590, encodeId=ffac8515902f, content=4 月23日投稿<br> 5月16号 ready for decision<br> 5月19号 ready for decision<br> 现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=150, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=072c5414108, createdName=ms4191257501199150, createdTime=Sat May 25 19:34:57 CST 2019, time=2019-05-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-05-25 ms4191257501199150

    4 月23日投稿
    5月16号 ready for decision
    5月19号 ready for decision
    现在已ready for decision7天了 有没有遇到这种情况的友友们

    0

共48条页码: 1/5页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map