Baidu
map
NANOTOXICOLOGY 润色咨询

Nanotoxicology

出版年份:2007 年文章数:1065 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Quarterly 自引率:8.7% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-18 ms2734610161496895

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-06-27 lovezhenzhen13

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂.

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-09-27 ms4591412325009157

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2015-04-24 CYCY

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。
    对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。
    nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2014-08-01 nano

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
    经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-06-29 bio_mini

    明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-06-29 ms6216037977688050

    不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856961, encodeId=09f2856961e4, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:撇开材料而言,在毒理学领域的圈内影响力无法和archives of toxicology以及toxicological sciences相提并论,新分区不知道搞什么嘛,大一区只剩下综述期刊了,这有点不太合理~~~ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=149, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18175414025, createdName=ms2734610161496895, createdTime=Sat Jan 18 15:11:04 CST 2020, time=2020-01-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=558485, encodeId=4361558485a3, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:这个杂志的编辑是一帮搞化学的人.真正的毒理出身的很少.他们更看中材料的表征.真正的毒理学评价和效应感觉他们不是很懂., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=385, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=9f651657781, createdName=lovezhenzhen13, createdTime=Wed Jun 27 12:04:00 CST 2018, time=2018-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838529, encodeId=8bf483852982, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2017.8.8—9.27 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8e55414120, createdName=ms4591412325009157, createdTime=Wed Sep 27 19:06:20 CST 2017, time=2017-09-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=511443, encodeId=60ea51144369, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:2014年10月22投稿,11月24得到一审结果,大修,两个审稿人均表示文章内容新颖有趣,但都提到要补实验。大修时间四个月,按要求补了几个其中关键实验,2015年3月24截止日投出修改稿,4月22直接接受。 <br> 对比师姐论文和我的论文(相关投稿过程见前面评论),感觉nanotoxicology更看重新颖性。这篇文章所提出的问题比较少见文献报道,所用的体外模型也比较高级,两个审稿人对文章的新意都表示了充分肯定,所要求补的实验也比较合理。而师姐的论文,实验室已经做过一些相关研究了,但师姐做得比较全,各种纳米颗粒的比较也很充分。所以,建议那种有新颖性,能提示未来研究方向的文章投稿。 <br> nanotoxicology审稿比较快,一般一个月左右会得到消息。我这篇应该也是一个月,拖延了两天,估计是因为周末的关系。很多文章从投稿到接受很长时间,是和比较长的修改文章时间有关,大修一般四个月,小修一般两个月。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=396, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=40ef1613356, createdName=CYCY, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 01:09:00 CST 2015, time=2015-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=504922, encodeId=7a5a5049226f, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:纳米类期刊,现在都一直往上走,纳米材料看来真是好呀, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=443, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=nano, createdTime=Fri Aug 01 23:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-08-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=480644, encodeId=29ae48064490, content=明年会不会降到3分呀,如果降3分以下就不值了, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=462, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=bio_mini, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:48:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814985, encodeId=c6ba814985e9, content=不知道为什么一下降了这么多。不过应该会螺旋上涨。继续看好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=148, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b7c35414048, createdName=ms6216037977688050, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 14:36:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814848, encodeId=e350814848cf, content=感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=138, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a7465414051, createdName=ms1357963030559907, createdTime=Mon Jun 27 10:31:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-06-27 ms1357963030559907

    感觉审稿速度很慢,好多文章都半年才能接受

    0

共8条页码: 1/1页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分

Baidu
Baidu
map
Baidu
map
Baidu
map